The Energy Age

Solar, Wind, Hydro, Gas, Coal


  • 8606 Greenwood Avenue, Suite #2
    Takoma Park, MD 20912-6656 
    301-588-4741;  sun-day-campaign@hotmail.com 
    follow on twitter: @SunDayCampaign 


    Note: News story excerpts provided below do not necessarily reflect the views of the SUN DAY Campaign or any of its respective members.


    NEW STUDIES, DATA, AND RESOURCES:

    Maine Is the State Adding the Most Clean Energy Jobs in New England

    Renewable Energy World, May 13, 2024

    According to a report commissioned by the Maine Governor’s Energy Office, the state has surpassed 15,000 jobs in the clean energy industry, with that sector contributing over $2 billion to the state’s economy in 2022. It found that the clean energy jobs now account for over 2% of the state’s total workforce and that this sector of the economy has grown 14% since 2016, bouncing back from pandemic-era disruptions. Maine’s clean energy workforce grew faster than any other New England state and increased at a rate more than three times faster than the state’s overall economy from 2016 to 2022. That puts the state on track to meet Governor Janet Mills’ goal of 30,000 clean energy jobs in Maine by 2030. The bulk of Maine’s clean energy workforce (58%) is within the energy efficiency sector, with renewable electric power generation constituting the second largest green job creator in the state


    Copper Can’t Be Mined Fast Enough to Electrify the U.S.

    University of Michigan, May 15, 2024

    According to a University of Michigan study, copper cannot be mined quickly enough to keep up with current U.S. policy guidelines to transition the country’s electricity and vehicle infrastructure to renewable energy. The Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law in 2022, calls for 100% of cars manufactured to be electric vehicles by 2035. But an electric vehicle requires three to five times as much copper as an internal combustion engine vehicle—not to mention the copper required for upgrades to the electric grid. To meet the copper needs of electrifying the global vehicle fleet, as many as six new large copper mines must be brought online annually over the next several decades. About 40% of the production from new mines will be required for electric vehicle-related grid upgrades.


    U.S. November Election Results Could Decelerate Energy Transition, with $1 Trillion in Energy Investment on the Line

    WoodMackenzie, May 16, 2024

    According to a new analysis by WoodMacKenzie, a Republican victory in 2024 could roll back decarbonization policies and usher in a delayed energy transition for the U.S. Low carbon supply investment would still occur but not at the pace for net zero. Wood Mackenzie’s base case projects about $7.7 trillion in investment for the U.S. energy sector over 2023-50. However, in a delayed transition scenario in the U.S., less policy support for things such as low-carbon energy and infrastructure improvements decreases investment for the U.S. energy sector by $1 trillion compared to the base case. To reach the net zero scenario, $11.8 trillion dollars in capital investment in U.S. energy is required on a cumulative basis from 2023-2050. Investment is 55% lower in the delayed transition scenario. Further, the total stock of EVs by 2050 would be 50% lower than in the base case while wind and solar and energy storage capacity would be about 500-GW by 2050, 25% lower than the base case. Moreover, by 2040, coal generation capacity would be four times higher than the base case.


    Latest North Carolina Clean Energy Report Finds Utilities Concerned About Load Growth

    Solar Power World, by Kelsey Misbrener, May 16, 2024

    The North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center’s Q1 2024 edition of the “50 States of Power Decarbonization” report finds that 48 states, as well as DC and Puerto Rico, took a total of 507 actions related to electric power decarbonization and resource planning during the quarter. Among integrated resource plans recently filed or under review by regulators in Q1 2024, planned capacity additions totaled 84,212-MW for solar, 64,846-MW for wind, 52,689-MW for storage, and 31,330-MW for natural gas, while planned coal retirements totaled 29,807-MW. The report also noes that load growth is top of mind for utilities as the impacts of increased manufacturing, data centers and electrification are evident in their resource planning.


    IEA Report Finds Prices for Metals for Wind Turbines and Solar Panels Dropping to Pre-Pandemic Levels

    ReNews.Biz, May 17, 2024

    According to the International Energy Agency’s “Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024” report, prices of critical minerals used in clean energy technologies such as electric vehicles, wind turbines and solar panels, fell steeply in 2023 after two years of rises, as supply outpaced demand growth. However, the current well-supplied market may not be a good guide for the future because the deployment of clean energy technologies drives strong demand for critical minerals. Announced projects can meet only 70% of copper and 50% of lithium needs in 2035 in a scenario where countries achieve their national climate goals. The market prospects for other minerals appear more balanced. IEA estimates that the combined market worth of key energy transition minerals will more than double to $770 billion by 2040 in a net zero scenario. Between now and 2040, some $800 billion should be invested in mining to align with a 1.5 degrees C scenario. The sum will be larger if recycling and reuse are not stepped up.


    Analysis Sheds Light on How the Market has Evolved One Year After California’s Phase-out of Net Metering

    North American Clean Energy, May 15, 2024

    According to a study conducted by Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, residential solar PV installations in California since the introduction of the NEM 3.0 – a billing structure of California’s rooftop solar net metering scheme – have been roughly equal to the amount in the prior year. Passage of NEM 3.0 in December 2022 set off a surge of applications seeking to qualify under the previous net metering tariffs (NEM 2.0) before its close in April 2023. The increase in applications led to a subsequent spike in net energy metering installations during the summer of 2023, and after that, the number of installations began a steady decline. As expected, PV systems are smaller under NBT—by about 9% overall and by 17% for systems co-installed with storage. This shift is likely driven in large part by the lower compensation for grid exports provided under NBT, though systems installed in new construction and by less affluent households tend to be smaller as well.


    U.S. Surpasses Five Million Solar Installations

    Solar Power World, by Billy Ludt, May 16, 2024

    According to data released by the Solar Energy Industries Association and Wood Mackenzie, the U.S. has officially exceeded five million solar installations, marking a significant achievement in the nation’s clean energy transition. This milestone comes just eight years after the U.S. reached one million installations in 2016 – a milestone that took 40 years to achieve following the first grid-connected solar installation in 1973. Over half of all U.S. solar installations have come online since the start of 2020 and over 25% have come online since the Inflation Reduction Act became law just 20 months ago. The residential sector accounts for 97% of all solar installations in the U.S. SEIA forecasts that solar installations in the U.S. will double to 10 million by 2030 and triple to 15 million by 2034.


    NERC Says 25-GW of New Solar to Boost Summer Grid Reliability, but Extreme Heat Poses Widespread Risks

    UtilityDive.com, by Robert Walton, May 16, 2024

    The North American Electric Reliability Corp.’s summer grid assessment concludes that large portions of the U.S. and Canadian electric grids are at risk of electricity supply shortfalls during heat waves and other extreme weather events this summer. NERC identified seven areas facing an “elevated risk” of shortfalls due to rising demand, generator retirements and unplanned outages, drought and the potential for low wind performance. Those areas include portions of Texas, California, New England and the Midwest. However, the addition of about 25-GW of solar capacity to the bulk power system since last year means that all parts of the grid should have adequate supply for normal peak load.


    Wind Farms Offset Their Emissions in Two Years

    Renews.Biz, May 16, 2024

    According to a peer-reviewed study published in the “Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand,” after less than two years, a wind farm can offset the carbon emissions generated across its entire 30-year lifespan, when compared to thermal power plants. The study reviewed current literature on wind farms, as well as using real construction data to take into account everything from the manufacturing of individual turbine parts, to transporting them into place, to decommissioning the entire wind farm at Harapaki – which comprises 41 machines. While the research used data from the Harapaki onshore wind farm in Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand, the authors explain their findings would be replicated across most, if not all, sites internationally.


    EPA Reports 2.06 Billion RINs Generated in April

    Biomass Magazine, by Erin Voegele, May 16, 2024

    According to data released by the U.S. EPA, more than 2.06 billion renewable identification numbers (RINs) were generated under the Renewable Fuel Standard in April, up from 1.84 billion generated during the same month of last year. Total RIN generation for the first four months of 2024 reached 7.93 billion, up from 7.25 billion generated during the same period of 2023. Nearly 68.85 million D3 cellulosic biofuel RINs were generated in April, including 61.77 million generated for compressed renewable natural gas (RNG) by domestic producers, 3.3 million generated for liquefied RNG by importers, 2.44 million generated for liquefied RNG by domestic producers, 694,722 generated for cellulosic ethanol by domestic producers, and 643,933 generated for compressed RNG by importers.


    Berkeley Lab Report Finds Storage Attachment Rates Jumped 10% Under NEM 3.0

    Solar Power World, by Kelsey Misbrener, May 15, 2024

    Berkeley Lab has released a short technical brief describing key trends in the California residential solar market since the roll-out of the new net billing tariff (NBT) structure. As expected, more customers are installing storage along with PV, but the pivot has been quite pronounced, with storage attachment rates jumping from roughly 10% under net energy metering (NEM) to 60% under NBT. Perhaps as a result of that sudden increase in demand, inflation-adjusted installed prices for paired PV+storage systems rose by about 17% under NBT, relative to their level under NEM.


    Faulty Installations Often to Blame for Battery Fires as Battery Storage Failure Incident Rate Dropped 97% Between 2018 and 2023

    Energy Storage News, by Andy Colthorpe, May 16, 2024

    The Electric Power Research Institute, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and German battery analysis specialist Twaice have jointly evaluated 26 battery fires between 2018 and 2023. They say that the diversity of components plays a critical role in igniting fires but allege most battery energy storage system failures could be prevented by quality assurance and battery monitoring. Further, the overall rate of incidents has sharply decreased, as lessons learned from early failure incidents have been incorporated into new designs and best practices.


    Hydrogen Supply Outlook 2024 – A Reality Check

    Bloomberg New Energy Finance, May 14, 2024

    BNEF expects clean H2 supply to skyrocket 30-fold from 0.5 million metric tons (Mt) of capacity online today to 16.4 Mt per year by 2030, driven by supportive policy and a maturing project pipeline. Still, this is not sufficient to meet most government targets. Less than a third of the 1,600 projects that have been announced to date materialize in BNEF’s bottom-up analysis, and often later than planned. By 2030, more than 50% of the world’s clean hydrogen capacity will come from electrolysis and more than 80% of all supplies will originate in the U.S., China and Europe. The U.S. is expected to become the single largest producer of clean H2 by 2030, accounting for almost 37% of global supply.


    Global Growth in Hydrogen Production Drives Forecast for Water Management Spending to $26 Billion by End of Decade

    North American Clean Energy, May 15, 2024

    According to a new report from Bluefield Research, green hydrogen has emerged as a key focal point of the global energy transition and is driving opportunities for companies across the water industry. To date, 30 countries have developed hydrogen strategies and roadmaps with almost 2,000 projects announced on every continent. However, the scale and success of the hydrogen market also depends on the sometimes-overlooked availability of water supplies because highly treated ultrapure water is the critical input for producing green hydrogen. Through 2030, $26.3 billion will be spent on water management for hydrogen applications.


    States Consider Pulling Back or Prohibiting Zero-Emission Vehicle Targets in Q1 2024

    North American Clean Energy, May 13, 2024

    According to the NC Clean Energy Technology Center’s Q1 2024 edition of “The 50 States of Electric Vehicles,” 46 states, plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico took actions related to electric vehicles and charging infrastructure last quarter, with the greatest number of actions relating to rebate and grant programs; registration, mileage, or charging fees for electric vehicles; state procurement of electric vehicles; charging infrastructure planning activities; and rules governing publicly available charging stations. States also continued to take actions planning for National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program funding distribution. A total of 595 electric vehicle actions were taken during Q1 2024, with the most active states being Massachusetts, New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey, Minnesota, Hawaii and Maryland. So far in 2024, 16 states have enacted legislation related to transportation electrification, as of early May 2024.


    U.S. Market Share of Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Sales Decreased from 18.8% to 18% in 1st Quarter of 2024

    U.S. Energy Information Administration, May 14, 2024

    According to an update from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, sales of battery electric vehicles (full EVs) dropped to 7.0% of overall light vehicle sales in the first quarter of 2024 from 8.1% in the previous quarter. Nationally, sales of hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and EVs combined dropped to 18.0% of the market, versus 18.8% in the previous quarter. Meanwhile, there was a decline in the whole light-duty vehicle market, led by a sag in luxury-vehicle sales, at a time when eight out of 10 EV sales are luxury models. However, in a trend that parallels a California EV trend for the quarter, EV sales by actual volume were actually up 7% in the first quarter of 2024 versus the same quarter in 2023.


    What Would Happen if We Electrified Every Bus in America?

    StreetsBlog.org, by Kea Wilson, May 14, 2024

    A recent study from Carnegie Mellon University found that electrifying America’s bus fleet could slash between one- and two-thirds of the fleet’s total greenhouse gases over the next 14 years, depending on how quickly it is done. The researchers found that if were possible to “wave a magic wand” and swap out every diesel bus on the road – a prospect that they estimate would cost $39.5 billion – America could zap an astonishing 40 million metric tons of greenhouse gases from the skies by 2035. Even simply replacing diesel buses with electric ones as they naturally age out of service, though, would still cut 35 million metric tons of CO2 by the 2035 deadline – and it could be done at the cost of just $8.5 billion to start, plus $2 billion to $3 billion a year every year until all the gas-guzzlers were gone.


    Over 4 Million Plugin Vehicles Sold Globally in 2024

    Rho Motion, May 17, 2024

    According to EV research-house Rho Motion, global EV sales reached 1.1 million units in April 2024, bringing year-to-date sales to 4.3 million, 22% greater than the same period in 2023. Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) represent 64% of units sold so far in 2024, with the remaining 36% Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV). The North American market has increased by 7% YTD, with Canada leading EV sales growth in the region with 27% YTD.


    Programs to Promote Zero-Energy and Zero-Carbon New Homes and Buildings Are Growing

    American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, by Steven Nadel, May 16, 2024

    A new ACEEE white paper identifies 22 programs advancing zero-energy, zero-carbon, or zero-energy-ready buildings, including 14 residential and 8 commercial programs. The 22 programs have a combined annual budget of approximately $110 million for 2024. This is about 70% more than the total budget for similar programs examined in a 2020 ACEEE study. Across these programs, more than 5,000 new single-family homes, nearly 25,000 new apartments, and 222 new commercial buildings totaling 9.5 million sq. ft. have been completed. These figures do not include most of the 21,000 homes completed under the DOE Zero-Energy-Ready Homes program, a growing national program.


    Banks Financed Fossil Fuels by $6.9 Trillion Dollars Since the Paris Agreement with $705 Billion Provided in 2023 Alone

    Sierra Club, May 13, 2024

    According to the 15th annual “Banking on Climate Chaos” report issued by a coalition of groups, the world’s 60 largest private banks have spent more than $6.9 trillion on fossil fuel financing since the Paris Climate Accords were signed in 2016. That total includes $705 billion in fossil fuel financing last year, with U.S. based banks accounting for 30% of that financing. The six largest U.S. banks – JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citi, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley – account for more than $1.8 trillion in fossil fuel financing from 2016 to 2023, or more than a quarter of the global total. After being overtaken by Royal Bank of Canada in 2022, JPMorgan Chase was again the top fossil fuel financier in 2023. JPMorgan spent $40.8 billion on fossil fuel financing last year.


    IDTechEx Forecasts Durable, Engineered CO2 Removals Will Reach 630 Mt by 2044

    North American Clean Energy, May 13, 2024

    A new IDTechEx report concludes that carbon dioxide removal will be needed to reach any international net zero emission targets and avoid global warming beyond 1.5-2°C. Negative emissions technologies, especially those that go beyond nature-based approaches to provide long-lasting scalable CO2 removals, have therefore been receiving increased support through government policy and voluntary carbon credit purchases from corporations with ambitious climate goals. By 2044, the world’s capacity for such durable, engineered CO2 removals will exceed 630 megatonnes per annum.


    April 2024 Was Earth’s Warmest on Record

    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, May 14, 2024

    April 2024 ranks as the warmest April on record and is also the 11th-consecutive month of record-breaking global warmth. The average global temperature in April was 2.38 degrees F (1.32 degrees C) above the 20th-century average of 56.7 degrees F (13.7 degrees C). Moreover, the year to date (January through April 2024) global temperature ranked as the warmest such period on record at 2.41 degrees F (1.34 degrees C) above the 20th-century average. There is now a 61% chance that 2024 will rank as the warmest year on record and a 100% chance that it will rank in the top five of warmest years recorded.


    Industrial Emissions Aren’t Falling Fast Enough to Meet U.S. Climate Goals

    Canary Media, by Maria Gallucci, May 16, 2024

    According to the Rhodium Group’s latest decarbonization outlook for industrial activities – including chemical refining, food processing, oil and gas production, steelmaking, and cement manufacturing – heavy industry could soon be the nation’s number one source of CO2 emissions. Currently, the country’s number one source of planet-warming pollution is the U.S. transportation sector. Heavy industry overtook electricity as the second-highest emitter in 2023. But whereas battery-powered vehicles and renewable energy projects are proliferating nationwide, and starting to edge out fossil fuels, the nation’s factories are making only plodding progress toward slashing greenhouse gas emissions. It estimated that, under current policies, industrial emissions could decline by just 5 to 10 percent by 2040, with a reduction of 81 million to 132 million metric tons of net greenhouse gas emissions.



    • Lots of Spills Week
    • 3 More Abandoned Shale Well NOVs
    • Well Shut in to Prevent Frack-Out


    From May 11 to 17, DEP’s Oil and Gas Compliance Database shows oil and gas inspectors filed 465 inspection entries, and caught up on posting more than the usual number of inspection reports from the previous week.


    • NOVs Issued In Last Week: 261 conventional, 60 unconventional
    • Year To Date – NOVs Issued: 4,882 conventional and 1,003 unconventional
    • Enforcements 2024: 9 conventional and 1 unconventional
    • Inspections Last Week: 3* conventional and 440 unconventional
    • Year To Date – Inspections: 11,425 conventional and 17,508 unconventional
    • Wells Drilled Last Week: 7 conventional and 16 unconventional
    • Year To Date Wells Drilled: 140 conventional and 305 unconventional

    On May 7, 2024, DEP did a follow-up inspection of the Wise Richard 4 conventional well in Henderson Township, Jefferson County owned by Stonehaven Energy Mgt Co. LLC and found the well abandoned and not plugged and the owner did little to clean up wastewater spill for 19 months.

    • On October 24, 2022, DEP issued a violation to Stonehaven Energy when a leak was discovered in a wastewater tank at this well site.
    • On March 27, 2023, DEP issued an administrative order to clean up the spill due to the lack of any action by the owner.
    • On August 16, 2023, DEP filed a petition to enforce the order in Commonwealth Court which then issued an order to Stonehaven Energy to submit a remediation plan.  No remediation plan has been received.
    • As of the May 7, 2024 inspection, no progress was observed in remediating the spill and no changes to the site were noted since an inspection on February 21, 2024.
    • The eFACTS database shows Stonehaven Energy has 975 permits for conventional oil and gas wells. with seven wells listed as abandoned– not this one.  All the others are listed as active.
    • DEP’s May 7 inspection report continues violations for abandonment and related to the spills, but no specific follow-up actions by the owner are included.

    On May 14, 2024, DEP did an inspection of the George Malinky 1 conventional well in Jordan Township, Clearfield County owned by Stonehaven Energy Mgt Co. LLC and found the well to be abandoned and not plugged.

    • DEP originally issued a violation for abandonment on February 15, 2023 and the owner was given until March 31, 2023 to submit a plan to DEP on how the well was to be brought into compliance  [DEP inspection report].  There was no record of the well owner responding.

    On May 7, 2024, DEP did a file review and issued a violation to Consol PA Coal Co. LLC for failure to plug a conventional well after it was abandoned.  There was no information on location or other details online.

    • The eFACTS database shows Consol PA Coal Co. LLC has 147 abandoned conventional wells, many more that number are inactive and holds a total of 1,173 conventional well permits.

    On May 15, 2024, DEP inspected the Triana Young Shale Gas Well Pad in Hector Township, Potter County owned by M4 Energy LLC and found three shale gas wells– 2H, 4H and 6H–  abandoned and not plugged and leaking gas.

    • A representative of M4 Energy was at the inspection.
    • DEP’s inspection report [2H example]  noted the original violations for abandonment were issued on August 7, 2023. There is no record of the well owner doing anything to address the violations.
    • No specific follow-up actions were required of the well owner in the inspection report.

    So far in 2024, DEP issued 478 new or continued violations to conventional oil and gas well owners for abandoning and not plugging wells; and 5 violations were issued to three shale gas well owners [M4 Energy, EQT (Rice Drilling B LLC) and Roulette Oil & Gas LLC)] for abandoning wells and not plugging wells.


    On May 13, 2024, DEP did an inspection of the Beechwood B09-1 Shale Gas Well pad in Shippen Township, Cameron County owned by Seneca Resources Co. LLC and found well #SRC WT 5036 321HU 53231 “temporarily shut in to prevent Hydraulic Fracturing communication with this well.”

    • DEP’s May 13 inspection report found “The vent readings and pressure gauge reading are consistent with previous inspections. No violations noted at this inspection.”
    • No violations and follow-up for the well owner was noted in this inspection report.

    On May 7, 8, 10, 14 & 15, 2024, DEP inspected multiple conventional wells owned by Diversified Prod LLC and found–

    • Clearfield County, Jordan Township: Williams Kovel 1 – DEP conducted a compliant inspection that found a wastewater release from a storage tank traveled downslope 70 feet, according to the partial cleanup observed by the inspector.  Conductivity readings showed contamination was in additional areas.  DEP’s inspection report included violations related to the spill and requested the well owner to submit a written plan by May 31, 2024 on how the site will be brought into compliance.
    • Clarion County, Porter Township: Ambrose 10 – Multiple areas of production wastewater spills, storage tank overflowing with no secondary containment, failure of erosion and sedimentation controls.  Well owner requested to submit a plan by May 28, 2024 to bring the well into compliance.  DEP inspection report included multiple violations related to spills.
    • Jefferson County, Rose Township: Barnett 1 – On May 9 the company reported a wastewater storage tank released 4,200 gallons of wastewater into unlined secondary containment.  DEP inspected on May 14 and found a partial cleanup underway.  The inspector noted the site was 320 feet from a residence that uses a spring for their water supply.  DEP’s inspection report included violations related to the spill and requested the well owner to submit a written plan by June 5, 2024 on how the site will be brought into compliance.
    • Jefferson County, Warsaw Township: Don Shaffer 2 – Owner reported wastewater storage tank leak on May 9 and DEP inspected on May 15 and documented partial cleanup at the site.  DEP’s inspection report included violations for the spill and requested the owner to submit a written report by June 6, 2024 on how the site will be brought into compliance.
    • Washington County, Fallowfield Township:  Spesak F41 – Follow-up inspection found no cleanup activity on wastewater leaks where violations were issued on November 16, 2023.  DEP’s inspection report continued violations with no follow-up actions by the well owner.
    • Washington County, Fallowfield Township: Stech F69 – Follow-up inspection found owner did little to correct erosion and sedimentation control violations discovered on November 30, 2023.  DEP’s inspection report included no specific follow-up actions by the well owner.
    • Westmoreland County, Bell Township: Elmer Reed 1 – Gas venting from production tank, owner requested to submit plan by June 10, 2024 to bring the well into compliance.  DEP inspection report includes related violations.
    • Westmoreland County, Donegal Township: Eleanor Morris 1 – owner failed to complete the remediation of the site impacted by a wastewater spill on February 26, 2024. DEP’s inspection report notes outstanding tasks not completed and continues violations.
    • DEP’s eFACTS database shows Diversified Prod LLC holds permits for 21,704 oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania.

    On May 9, 2024, DEP inspected the Wilford Chambers 1 conventional gas well in Richhill Township, Greene County owned by BB Mulvaney and found it was venting gas near a residence.

    • Violations were also noted for a release of wastewater, failure to notify DEP of a permit transfer and failure to submit annual production, waste generation and well integrity reports.
    • DEP’s inspection report requested the owner to submit a written report by May 27, 2024 on how the well will be brought into compliance.

    On May 10, 2024, DEP inspected the Kimmy 1 conventional gas well in Venango Township, Erie County owned by Dannic Energy Corp and found evidence of wastewater leaking from a storage tank and around the wellhead.

    • DEP’s inspection report requested the owner to submit a written report by May 31, 2024 on how the well site will be brought into compliance.

    On May 15, 2024, DEP did a follow-up inspection of the Gaut 2 conventional well in South Huntingdon Township, Westmoreland County owned by Questa Petro Co. and found evidence of wastewater releases from a storage tank that had since been removed.

    • DEP’s inspection report included multiple violations related to the spill and requested the well owner to submit a written report by May 29, 2024 on how the site will be brought into compliance.

    On May 8, 2024, DEP did a follow-up inspection of the Mallory Pad A Shale Gas Well Pad in Plunketts Creek Township, Lycoming County owned by EQT ARO LLC and found evidence of wastewater contamination in a stormwater channel.

    • Areas of the pad impacted by a spill report on March 1, 2024 appeared dry without staining.
    • Meanwhile drilling continued to remove plugs from wells on the pad.
    • DEP’s inspection report included a new violation for the new spill and a request to the owner to submit a written report by May 24, 2024 on how the site will be cleaned up.
    • On May 14, 2024, DEP did another follow-up inspection at the Mallory Pad A Shale Gas Well pad and found no effort was made to permanently clean up the wastewater contamination found earlier.
    • Wastewater was continuing to flow into the stormwater channel and into a sump and was being sucked up by a vacuum truck.
    • Meanwhile drilling continued to remove plugs from wells on the pad.

    On May 13, 2025, DEP inspected the Sun Mine Shale Gas Well Pad in Fawn Township, Allegheny County owned by Range Resources Appalachia LLC in response to a notification by the company a spill took place on May 10.

    • The company said drill cuttings and a soap slurry fluid were sprayed out of the flare stack in a “fine mist” from the eco tank after a malfunction in the fluid-gas separator.
    • The company had already done a cleanup of the site around the tank, the well pad berm and down the slope of the well pad by removing contaminated soil.


    On May 7, 2024, DEP did a follow-up inspection of a portion of the NITMS022-NITMH022 Pipeline in Wayne Township, Greene County owned by EQM Gathering OPCO LLC and found the company had failed to repair a slope failure reported on April 4, 2024.


    On May 7, 2024, DEP did an inspection of the Beta 5 Winterfell Pipeline right-of-way in Richhill Township, Greene County owned by EQM Gathering OPCO LLC in response to a notification of a slope failure.

    • DEP found the owner took steps to temporarily stabilize the failure area, but had not yet installed permanent stabilization measures.
    • DEP’s inspection report included violations for the slope failure and requested a written report by May 24, 2024 on how the site will be brought into compliance.

    On May 13, 2024, DEP did a follow-up inspection of a portion of the NINF-S042 Gas Pipeline in Fallowfield Township Washington County owned by EQM Gathering OPCO LLC and found the slope failure was not repaired since it was discovered on March 20, and in fact, has moved further down slope.

    • DEP’s inspection report notes the area remains unstable and prone to additional movement and continues the previous violations.
    • No specific follow-up actions were required of the pipeline owner.

    On May 15, 2024, DEP did follow-up inspections at several locations along the Revolution Gas Pipeline in Beaver County owned by ETC Northeast Pipeline LLC where slope failures occurred on or about April 8.

    • DEP inspection reports [Station 1777+25 example] show some areas experienced more slope movement and more soil cracking.  
    • The previous violations were continued, but no specific follow-up actions were included for the pipeline owner.

    On May 15, 2024, DEP inspected the newly constructed Mingo Shale Gas Well Pad in Union Township, Washington County owned by EQT Prod Co and discovered multiple slope failures.

    • No wells have been drilled on this pad.
    • DEP’s inspection report included violations for the slope failures and requested the owner to submit a written plan by May 31, 2024 on how the site will be brought into compliance.

    On May 7, 2024, DEP did follow-up inspections at two impoundments owned by Geopetro LLC in Beaver County and found restoration work had not been complete on either one–

    • Ohioville Borough: Paul Bussard Pad A & Frac Pond: Failure to address violations issued on February 21, 2024.  DEP inspection report.
    • South Beaver Township: David L. Thompson Pad A Impoundment: Failure to address violations issued on March 28, 2024.  DEP inspection report.
    • The inspection reports did not include any specific follow-ups by the owner.

    On May 8, 2024, DEP did an inspection of the Zelman Underground Injection Disposal Well site in Brady Township, Clearfield County owned by Kendra Disposal LLC and found multiple erosion and sedimentation control failures at the site and on the gravel road leading to the facility.

    • The site was fully operational at the time of the inspection, but no wastewater was being accepted as the company “is currently in contract negotiations with waste operators,” according to DEP.
    • DEP’s inspection report included multiple violations for these failures and requested the owner to submit a written report by May 29, 2024 on how the site will be brought into compliance.

    • On May 10, 2024, DEP issued notices of violation to Equitrans Water SVC (PA) LLC for failure to comply with water management plans.  The NOVs were not posted online and no other details were available.
    • On May 10, 2024, DEP issued notices of violation to HG Energy II Appalachia LLC for failure to comply with water management plans.  The NOVs were not posted online and no other details were available.

    To report oil and gas violations or any environmental emergency or complaint, visit DEP’s Environmental Complaint webpage.

    Text photos and the location of abandoned wells to 717-788-8990.


    Visit DEP’s Compliance Reporting Database webpage to search their compliance records by date and owner and the Inspection Reports Viewer.

    Sign up for DEP’s eNOTICE service which sends you information on oil and gas and other permits submitted to DEP for review in your community.

    • [Note: These may not be all the NOVs issued to oil and gas companies during this time period.  Additional inspection reports may be added to DEP’s Oil and Gas Compliance Database.]


    [Posted: May 18, 2024]  PA Environment Digest


  • In Justin Nobel’s new book, PETROLEUM-238: Big Oil’s Dangerous Secret and the Grassroots Fight to Stop It, he makes multiple references to the exemption provided for radioactive drilling and fracking waste, due to the Bentsen and Bevill Waste Amendments.

    PENNSYLVANIA’S MARCELLUS SHALE
    Maximum radium level (Ra-226+Ra228) and average radium level in oilfield brine for the Marcellus Formation in Pennsylvania:

    • Maximum: 28,500 pCi/L
    • Average: 9,330 pCi/L
    • Source: Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactivity Materials (TENORM) Study Report (Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, 2016).

    Below are the details about these ‘special waste’ exemptions:



    RCRA is the primary federal law governing the management of solid and hazardous waste. Enacted in 1976, RCRA recodified and amended the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965.


    Sometimes referred to by the names of their sponsors, Representative Thomas Bevill and Senator Lloyd Bentsen, the amendments exclude specific large-volume industrial solid waste from Subtitle C, as follows:

    • The Bevill Amendment — Fly ash waste, bottom ash waste, slag waste, and flue gas emission control waste generated primarily from the combustion of coal or other fossil fuels; solid waste from the extraction, beneficiation, and processing of ores and minerals, including phosphate rock and overburden from the mining of uranium ore; and cement kiln dust (42 U.S.C. §6921(b)(3)(A)(i)-(iii)).
    • The Bentsen Amendment — Drilling fluids, produced waters, and other wastes associated with the exploration, development, and production of crude oil or natural gas or geothermal energy (42 U.S.C. §6921(b)(2)(A)).

    Special Wastes History

    When EPA proposed regulations for managing hazardous waste under Subtitle C of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) on December 18, 1978 (43 FR 58946), the agency deferred hazardous waste requirements for six categories of waste—which EPA termed “special wastes”—until further study and assessment could be completed to determine their risk to human health and the environment. These wastes typically are generated in large volumes and, at the time, were believed to possess less risk to human health and the environment than the wastes being identified for regulation as hazardous waste.

    On October 12, 1980, Congress enacted the Solid Waste Disposal Act Amendments of 1980 (Public Law 96-482), which included the Bentsen and Bevill Amendments (sections 3001(b)(2)(A) and 3001(b)(3)(A)) These new sections exempted “special wastes” from regulation under Subtitle C of RCRA until further study and assessment of risk could be performed. Specifically, the Bentsen Amendment (section 3001(b)(2)(A)) exempted drilling fluids, produced waters, and other wastes associated with the exploration, development, and production of crude oil or natural gas or geothermal energy. The Bevill Amendment (section 3001(b)(3)(A)) exempted fossil fuel combustion waste; waste from the extraction, beneficiation, and processing of ores and minerals (including phosphate rock and overburden from uranium ore mining); and cement kiln dust.

    The Bevill and Bentsen Amendments also required EPA to complete full assessments of each exempted waste and submit a formal report to Congress on its findings. Section 8002 explicitly identified the requirements for each special waste study and established deadlines for submission of the final reports. After completion of each respective “Report to Congress”, EPA was then required to make a final regulatory determination within six months as to whether the special waste in question warranted regulation as a hazardous waste under Subtitle C of RCRA.

    The EPA submitted Reports to Congress and issued final regulatory determinations for each of the special wastes. For more information on each of the special wastes and links to their regulatory timelines, check out the next section.

    Certain wastes from the exploration and production of oil, natural gas, and geothermal energy are excluded from hazardous waste regulations under Subtitle C of RCRA. These wastes include those that have been brought to the surface during oil and gas exploration and production operations, and other wastes that have come into contact with the oil and gas production stream (e.g., materials used to process natural gas).


    Management of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Waste

    Wastes generated from crude oil and natural gas exploration and production are generally subject to regulation under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and state regulations, and many state governments have specific regulations and guidance for exploration and production wastes. In addition, some states are developing legislation and regulations in response to the increase in the use of hydraulic fracturing, including requirements related to waste management.

    As the use of hydraulic fracturing has increased, so too have concerns about potential impacts on public health and the environment, including potential impacts arising from improper management of wastes from exploration and production activities. Proper waste management is important for all exploration and production wastes, including those that are associated with hydraulic fracturing activities.


    Management of Oil and Gas Wastes – 2019 Review

    Section 2002(b) of RCRA requires every regulation promulgated under the Act to be reviewed and, where necessary, revised not less frequently than every three years. On May 4, 2016, the Environmental Integrity Project and others filed a lawsuit with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that alleged EPA had failed to perform its non-discretionary duty under Section 2002(b) to evaluate the federal Subtitle D solid waste regulatory requirements for the management of wastes associated with exploration, development and production wastes from crude oil, natural gas and geothermal energy (oil and gas) activities.

    In response, EPA entered into a consent decree to conduct a review and determine whether revisions to the federal solid waste management regulations are necessary. To support this effort, EPA conducted an extensive literature review of government, industry and academic sources to supplement the information available from previous Agency actions. This review, to determine whether changes to the federal solid waste regulations are necessary, evaluated factors such as waste characteristics, management practices, damage cases and the coverage of state programs.

    Based on the information gathered for this review, EPA concludes that revisions to the federal regulations for the management of exploration, development and production wastes of crude oil, natural gas and geothermal energy under Subtitle D of RCRA (title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations in Part 257) are not necessary at this time. Additional information comprising EPA’s review and decision is contained in the document entitled, Management of Oil and Gas Exploration, Development and Production Wastes: Factors Informing a Decision on the Need for Regulatory Action. EPA will continue to work with states and other organizations to identify areas for continued improvement and to address emerging issues to ensure that exploration, development and production wastes continue to be managed in a manner that is protective of human health and the environment. Learn more about EPA’s collaboration with the State Review of Oil and Natural Gas Environmental Regulations.


    Natural gas plays a key role in our nation’s clean energy future. The United States has vast reserves of natural gas that are commercially viable as a result of advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technologies enabling greater access to gas in shale formations. Responsible development of America’s shale gas resources offers important economic, energy security, and environmental benefits.

    Oil and gas exploration and production well installation operations typically comprise three stages:

    • Well Drilling and Completion Stage
      Wastes Produced:
      • Drilling Fluids (drilling muds)
      • Cuttings
      • Produced Water
    • Well Stimulation Stage (hydraulic fracturing)
      Wastes Produced:
      • Fracturing Fluid Returns
      • Produced Water
    • Well Production Stage
      Wastes Produced:
      • Produced Water

    During hydraulic fracturing specially engineered fluids containing chemical additives and proppant (eg., sand) are pumped under high pressure into a well to create and hold open fractures within the geologic formation. Hydraulic fracturing is often performed in stages, and following each stage, some fluids return to the surface as fracturing fluid returns (‘flowback’).

    It is important to note that the use of horizontal drilling in conjunction with hydraulic fracturing can often result in large volumes of flowback, a key attribute distinguishing wastes generated during hydraulic fracturing in unconventional reservoirs from wastes generated during other types of exploration and production activities. For example, larger volumes of flowback require larger on-site storage capacity, either using land-based units (pits) or tanks.


    While many exploration and production wastes are exempt from regulation as hazardous waste under Subtitle C of RCRA, these wastes are generally subject to non-hazardous waste regulation under RCRA Subtitle D and applicable state regulations. Many state governments have specific regulations and guidance for exploration and production wastes.

    Over the last several years, many states have been developing and updating legislation and regulations in light of the increase in the use of hydraulic fracturing, including requirements related to waste management. Exploration and production activity occurring on federal lands is regulated under the jurisdiction of the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM), subject to BLM regulations and guidance. EPA strongly believes that the management of exploration and production wastes should occur in a manner that prevents releases of hazardous constituents to the environment, particularly releases that may impact groundwater and surface water resources.

    EPA reviewed the waste-related provisions of state regulations as of March 2014, for oil and natural gas waste pits and storage tanks for 26 of 33 gas producing states (ie., states with the most significant shale gas activity). The review examined only the state statutes and regulations and did not include a review of permitting decisions, compliance monitoring, or enforcement actions. EPA consulted the following sources:

    • State Regulations and Statutes
    • State Review of Oil and Natural Gas Environmental Regulations (STRONGER) Board state reviews
    • 2009 Department of Energy (DOE) Report: State Regulations Designed to Protect Water Resources

    In addition, EPA staff contacted each of the 26 reviewed states’ primary regulatory agencies to verify cited regulations and ensure recent and ongoing updates to regulations were reflected in the review.

    • All 26 reviewed states have oil and gas regulations.
    • State regulations vary greatly in scope and detail.
    • Regulatory programs can include regulatory parameters such as liner requirements, clear definitions of waste fluids and characterization requirements, operational controls, maintenance, closure, and financial assurance requirements.
    • Several areas do not appear to have specific requirements; for example, groundwater monitoring, air monitoring, or post closure monitoring.
    • Numerous states have recently updated regulations to include disclosure requirements for the chemicals used in the practice of hydraulic fracturing.

    State regulations continue to evolve as hydraulic fracturing issues become more prevalent and additional information becomes available. Below are individual state summaries and a link to a resource for state regulatory programs.

    State exploration and production regulation summary


    Regulation concerning technical requirements for oil field waste pits are found primarily in Pennsylvania Code, Title 25 (Environmental Protection), Part 1 (Department of Environmental Protection), Subpart C (Protection of Natural Resources), Article I (Land Resources), Chapter 78 (Oil and Gas Wells) and Chapter 91 (General Provisions). Additional language can be found in the PA Act 13 of 2012.

    • PA Act 13 of 2012 §3215 prevents wells from being sited in any floodplain if the well is to employ a pit or impoundment or a tank managing solid wastes from oil and gas exploration and production

    • PA Act 13 of 2012 §3216 requires that a well site be restored following cessation of drilling operations. This includes restoration of the earthwork or soil disturbed, removal of all drilling supplies and equipment within 9 months after the completion of the drilling well, and compliance with all applicable requirements of the Clean Streams Law. The restoration period is subject to an extension if certain conditions are met.

    • § 78.56 details requirements for pits and tanks that are used to manage wastes temporarily. Some requirements include a minimum of 2’ of freeboard for pits or impoundments, structural soundness of pits and tanks, minimum liner requirements, and waste separations and prohibitions.

    • § 78.57 details requirements for management of production fluids, including collection of brine and other fluids from the well operations, requirements for pits, removal and disposal of fluids, and restoration of the waste management units or facilities following the closure or cessation of operations.

    • § 78.61 details the requirements for disposal of drill cutting, including criteria to be met to allow disposal in a pit, criteria to be met to allow disposal by land application, other methods of disposal of drill cuttings, and compliance requirements for disposal.

    • § 78.64 details secondary containment criteria to be met for tanks used on drill sites, including required capacity and inspection requirements.

    • § 78.65 details site restoration requirements following the cessation of operations at a well site.

    • § 78.301-314 details financial assurance requirements for oil and gas exploration and development, including specific bonding requirements.

    • Pennsylvania has proposed regulatory changes to Chapter 78 of the Pennsylvania Administrative Code, Title 25. The public comment period closed in mid-March, 2014. There is currently no schedule to finalization of the proposed regulatory changes.


    In concert with the application of state regulatory requirements, there are a variety of voluntary management practice guidance (often referred to in industry as “Best Management Practices,” or “BMPs”) for operators to evaluate and use in the development of site-specific exploration and production waste management plans.

    EPA strongly urges operators to evaluate and, as appropriate, employ practices best suited to prevent releases during the generation and management of exploration and production wastes including wastes from hydraulic fracturing. EPA agrees with the statement from the Bureau of Land Management that voluntary management guidance for oil and gas exploration and production wastes should be matched and adapted to meet the site-specific requirements of the project and local environment. Operators should also integrate source reduction and recycling measures into their operations, where practicable.

    EPA conducted a literature review/internet search and developed a list of more than 80 publicly available sources of voluntary management practices for oil and gas exploration and production wastes as they relate to pits, tanks, and land application/disposal. From this list, EPA focused on fourteen key documents/websites that are widely used and developed summaries of the pit, tank, and land application-related management practices contained in the fourteen selected sources.

    There is much existing guidance developed and being used by industry, federal, state, and non-governmental organizations. The scope ranges from local to state, regional, national, and international. The guidance documents/websites compiled in this review are readily available to the public. In addition, there are ongoing efforts by the various groups to continuously develop additional guidance and improve existing ones.

    The report contains six sections:

    • introduction
    • methodology
    • list of publicly available sources of voluntary management practices for oil and gas exploration and production wastes as they relate to pits, tanks, and land application/disposal
    • list of selected guidance documents/websites for further analysis
    • summaries of the relevant practices in the selected guidance
    • our findings

    The summaries in Section five contain the following information for each document: sponsoring organization, document/website title, date of publication, website location, general description, and excerpts of the specific sections that concern pits, tanks, and/or land application.

    Compilation of Publicly Available Sources or Voluntary Management Practices for Oil and Gas Exploration & Production Wastes as They Address, Pits, Tanks, and Land Application


    Legislative and Regulatory Timeline for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Waste

    This timeline walks through the history of crude oil and natural gas waste regulation since 1976 and includes information such as regulations, proposals, notices, amendments, reports and meetings and site visits conducted.

    Date(s)Action or EventNotes on Significance to Crude Oil and Natural Gas Wastes
    10/21/1976Enactment of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (117 pp, 662 K, About PDF) 
    12/18/1978EPA proposes first set of hazardous waste management standards (PDF) (volume 43 of the Federal Register (FR) starting on page 58945) (248 pp, 63 MB, About PDF)Oil and gas drilling muds and oil production brines are proposed to be designated as one of the six “special wastes”, which are exempt from RCRA Subtitle C regulations
    10/12/1980Solid Waste Disposal Act Amendments enacted (26 pp, 4.58 MB, About PDF)Bentsen amendment added: temporarily exempts crude oil and gas waste from hazardous waste regulation until further study is completed
    10/31/1983EPA misses the statutory deadline for submitting crude oil and gas waste report to Congress 
    04/1987Deadline for submission is extended to 12/1987 
    12/1987EPA submits a three-volume report to CongressCovers Management of Waste form the Exploration, Development, and Production of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Geothermal Energy
    07/06/1988EPA issues its Regulatory Determination for Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Exploration, Development and Production WastesEPA believes that regulation of oil and gas exploration and production wastes under RCRA Subtitle C is not warranted
    03/22/1993EPA issues Clarification of the Regulatory Determination for Wastes from the Exploration, Development and Production of Crude Oil, Natural Gas and Geothermal Energy 
    10/2002EPA issues the publication, Exemption of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Wastes from Federal Hazardous Waste Regulations 
    12/2008EPA clarifies the regulatory status of spent oil shale generated by above ground retorting or heating of oil shale 
    04/2019EPA determines that revisions to the federal regulations for the management of wastes associated with the exploration, development and production of crude oil, natural gas and geothermal energy under Subtitle D of RCRA (title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations in Part 257) are not necessary at this time. This determination fulfills EPA’s obligation under a consent decree issued by a federal court in December of 2016. 

     


    Existing EPA Authority to Regulate Bevill-Bentsen Waste Two categories of Bevill-Bentsen wastes that have recently drawn national attention include wastewater generated from natural gas production that involves hydraulic fracturing and coal combustion waste (CCW) generated at coal-fired power plants (e.g., “coal ash”). That attention has been due, in part, to changes in the volume or nature of the waste or as a result of risks to human health and the environment associated with improper management of the waste.

    The potential for EPA to regulate spent fracking fluid, CCW, or any other Bevill-Bentsen wastes has drawn the attention of some Members of Congress, generally for two opposing reasons: (1) given its current authority under RCRA, EPA may not be able to regulate the waste adequately to address risks associated with its disposal; or (2) given existing state and other federal requirements applicable to the management of the waste, EPA will subject the waste to unnecessary requirements that are costly and burdensome to states and to industry.

    RCRA does not identify which wastes are hazardous and therefore subject to Subtitle C regulation. Instead, Congress left that designation to EPA. However, in 1980 amendments to RCRA, several categories of high-volume industrial waste were statutorily excluded from Subtitle C requirements, pending further study by EPA. Commonly referred to as the Bevill and Bentsen amendments, those exclusions are for waste generated from the exploration and production of crude oil or natural gas (“Bentsen waste”), and cement kiln dust, mining and mineral processing waste, and waste from the combustion of coal and other fossil fuels at electric utilities and industrial facilities (“Bevill waste”).

    A key reason Bevill-Bentsen wastes were excluded from Subtitle C was because they were generated in tremendous amounts, particularly when compared to other waste intended to be regulated under Subtitle C. That remains the case today. In 2011, all regulated hazardous waste was produced by a total of 16,447 industrial waste generators, and totaled 34.3 million tons. That year, there were 589 coal-fired power plants in the United States. According to industry estimates, such plants generated approximately 130 million tons of coal combustion waste (CCW, a Bevill waste). Other Bevill-Bentsen waste is generated in similarly large quantities.

    Regulations established under Subtitle C apply only to the management of solid waste identified as hazardous. Under Section 3001, EPA was required to promulgate criteria for identifying the characteristics of hazardous waste and for listing hazardous waste. In developing those criteria, EPA was required to take into account factors including “toxicity, persistence, and degradability in nature, potential for accumulation in tissue, and other related factors such as flammability, corrosiveness, and other hazardous characteristics.”

    EPA stated that it had limited information about the waste. Information the agency did have indicated it “occurs in very large volumes, that the potential hazards posed by the waste are relatively low…

    If regulated or explicitly not regulated under Subtitle C, those concerns included the potential cost to industry, given uncertainties of risks associated with such wastes; conflicts with other federal law, such as wastewater treatment requirements being implemented under the Clean Water Act (CWA); and precedent that would be set by giving preferential treatment to certain industries to be exempt from strict Subtitle C requirements.

    Both CWA and SDWA requirements apply to the management of some Bevill-Bentsen waste. For example, CWA requires that discharges of pollutants to surface waters (e.g., wastewater discharges to a river, bay, or ocean) must be authorized by a permit issued under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Wastewater discharges to publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) are also subject to NPDES permitting requirements. Also, the SDWA regulates subsurface injection of fluids, including wastewater, pursuant to regulations established under the Underground Injection Control (UIC) program.

    Since EPA determined that regulation under Subtitle C was not warranted, various stakeholders representing environmental, public health, and industry groups have disagreed over whether the exclusion results in risks to human health and the environment. Those stakeholders, as well as EPA and state regulatory agencies, have disagreed on a wide range of issues, including the level of risk posed by the waste; whether or not existing state or other federal requirements are adequate to address risks associated with the waste; the degree to which there are gaps in local or state regulation of the waste; and whether regulation under Subtitle C is an appropriate mechanism to manage the waste. In recent years, issues common to that debate have been raised with regard to two exclusions from Subtitle C—the Bentsen exclusion for waste generated from natural gas exploration and production (E&P waste), and the Bevill exclusion for CCW.

    With regard to E&P waste, the recent increase in the use of hydraulic fracturing to extract natural gas from shale formations has resulted in a dramatic increase in the generation of associated wastewater. Neither the volume nor the nature of wastewater produced during shale gas extraction was considered by EPA in its 1988 regulatory determination for E&P waste. That is not to suggest that Subtitle C requirements necessarily provide the most appropriate mechanism to regulate such wastewater, but rather details specific to the waste as it is currently being produced were not considered when evaluating whether existing state or other federal requirements were adequate to protect human health and the environment from risks associated with managing the waste.

    Various stakeholders representing industry, state regulatory agencies, public health, and environmental groups, to name a few, reacted strongly to EPA’s 2010 proposal to subject a Bevill waste to new RCRA requirements. Concerns raised by those stakeholders were also reflected in the reaction from some Members of Congress. For example, some Members expressed concern over the cost to industry and state regulatory agencies, as well as broader impacts to the economy, energy prices, or recycling opportunities. Others have expressed concern that, given the risk associated with improper management, Subtitle C provides EPA with the only available option to establish enforceable national standards to protect human health and the environment from risks associated with the waste. Similarly, EPA’s lack of authority to enforce any regulations it may establish under Subtitle D has led some Members to oppose any proposal to regulate only solid waste disposal facilities that may receive the waste. Other Members have also expressed concern that subjecting industry to regulation, under Subtitle C or D, could prove burdensome to industry by expanding actions potentially subject to citizen suits under RCRA.

    In the future, under its Subtitle C authority, EPA could reverse previous regulatory determinations and promulgate regulations for any Bentsen-Bevill waste. EPA authority to implement those regulations is different under the Bevill and Bentsen amendments. Pursuant to the Bentsen amendment, if EPA determines that Subtitle C regulations are necessary, any regulations the agency may promulgate must be submitted to Congress. Those regulations could take effect, however, only when authorized by an act of Congress.

    Solid waste that does not meet the regulatory definition of a hazardous waste, including solid waste that is explicitly deemed not a hazardous waste (e.g., Bevill-Bentsen waste), is regulated under RCRA Subtitle D.35 In contrast to Subtitle C requirements, Subtitle D regulates only the disposal of solid waste. It does not establish controls governing the transportation, storage, or treatment of such wastes prior to disposal. EPA could potentially draw from its Subtitle D authorities to establish requirements applicable to solid waste disposal facilities that receive a particular Bevill-Bentsen waste. Congress established state and local governments as the primary planning, regulating, and implementing entities responsible for managing solid waste. EPA’s authority to regulate solid waste under Subtitle D is limited.

    As noted previously, for each Bevill-Bentsen waste, EPA identified hazardous constituents in the waste and conditions under which those constituents could find a pathway of exposure to humans at levels deemed unsafe. The agency could take an enforcement action under RCRA Section 7003 to require an individual facility to abate conditions that may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to human health or the environment resulting from the past or present handling, storage, treatment, transportation, or disposal of solid waste.

    Other federal statutes authorize EPA to take similar enforcement actions to abate conditions that may present an imminent hazard to human health. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) is the broadest of these authorities, and may address releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants into the environment. Other examples include the CWA, which may address discharges of pollutants into U.S. waters, and the SDWA, which may address the threat of contaminants to public water systems or underground sources of drinking water.

    As EPA collects more information on the risks associated with managing Bevill-Bentsen waste and the degree to which state regulatory programs control those risks, the agency may determine that national standards applicable to Bevill or Bentsen wastes are needed. Given the likely opposition to regulating the waste under Subtitle C or D, EPA may use certain other authorities as necessary to protect human health and the environment.

    Title: Background on and Implementation of the Bevill and Bentsen Exclusions in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act: EPA Authorities to Regulate “Special Wastes”

    Report#: R43149

    Author(s): Linda Luther

    Date: August 06, 2013


    Title: United States Code, 2018 Edition, Supplement 4, Title 42 – THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

    Category: Bills and Statutes

    Collection: United States Code

    Contained Within: Title 42 – THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
    CHAPTER 82 – SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
    SUBCHAPTER III – HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
    Sec. 6921 – Identification and listing of hazardous waste

    Date: 2022

    Laws In Effect As Of Date: January 5, 2023

    § 6921. Identification and listing of hazardous waste

    (a) Criteria for identification or listing Not later than eighteen months after October 21, 1976, the Administrator shall, after notice and opportunity for public hearing, and after consultation with appropriate Federal and State agencies, develop and promulgate criteria for identifying the characteristics of hazardous waste, and for listing hazardous waste, which should be subject to the provisions of this subchapter, taking into account toxicity, persistence, and degradability in nature, potential for accumulation in tissue, and other related factors such as flammability, corrosiveness, and other hazardous characteristics. Such criteria shall be revised from time to time as may be appropriate…

    42 U.S.C. 6921 – Identification and listing of hazardous waste (6-page PDF)



  • By David E. Hess | PA Environment Digest
    May 17, 2024 | Full story


    Note: The Department of Environmental Protection published 72 pages of public notices related to proposed and final permit and approval/ disapproval actions in the May 18 PA Bulletin – pages 2623 to 2695.


    — The PA Infrastructure Investment Authority and DEP published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin inviting comments on the FY 2024 Intended Use Plans For Federal Drinking Water, wastewater, Nonpoint Source and Pollution Abatement Plans.  The deadline for comments is June 17.  Click Here for copies of the Plans.

    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin announcing it is extending the NPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (PAG-13) until a new PAG-13 is reissued.

    The notice also said no deadlines contained in the existing PAG-13 previously set to expire on March 15, 2025, including the date by which implementation of Pollutant Reduction Plans and Pollutant Control Measures must be achieved, are extended by this notice.


    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin inviting comments on a proposed redesignation request and maintenance plan for the Beaver Area Nonattainment Area for Sulfur Dioxide Air Quality Standard showing the area can attain the standard. DEP has scheduled a hearing for June 18.  Read more here.

    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin inviting groups and individuals to submit technical data on water quality, instream habitat or biological information as part of stream redesignation evaluations in Berks, Bucks, Centre, Forest, Greene Huntingdon, Lancaster, Westmoreland counties.  The deadline for submitting data is June 17.  Read more here.

    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin of changes to the list of companies certified to perform radon-related activities in Pennsylvania.  (PA Bulletin, page 2691)


    — The Environmental Hearing Board published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin announcing the publication of final regulations making changes to its Practices and Procedures.


    — The Fish & Boat Commission published these notices in the May 18 PA Bulletin–

         — Final Additions, Revisions to List Of Wild Trout Streams

         — Proposed Additions to List of Wild Trout Streams

         — Proposed Additions to List of Class A Wild Trout Streams


    — The Environmental Hearing Board published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin announcing it will hold a hearing August 5 on the Liberty Township and CEASRA, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Protection and Tri-County Landfill (Mercer County), Permittee appeal to be held in Pittsburgh.  [EHB Doc. No. 2023-036-L]


    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin inviting comments on a revised Title V Air Quality Operating Permit including RACT II requirements for the Seward Generation, LLC coal waste power plant in East Wheatfield Twp., Indiana County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2659Read more here.

    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin inviting comments on the renewal of a Title V Air Quality Permit with RACT III revisions for the Flexsys America, LP Monongahela Plant in Carroll Twp., Washington County.  A public hearing is set for June 18.  (PA Bulletin, page 2660Read more here.

    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin inviting comments on an individual NPDES Stormwater Permit for the GLC Newberry, LLC warehouse project on 122 acres impacting Fishing Creek in Newberry Twp., York County. (PA Bulletin, page 2652)

    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin inviting comments on an individual NPDES Stormwater Permit for the Sandy Ridge Wind 2, LLC project on 1,221 acres impacting Sink Run, Vanscoyoc Run, Big Fill Run and Decker Run in Snyder, Rish and Taylor Townships, Blair County. (PA Bulletin, page 2652)

    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin announcing a June 20 hearing on an individual Stormwater Permit for a 92.5 acre commercial development by I80-115 C-1 Site, LLC in Tunkhannock Twp., Monroe County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2691Read more here.

    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin announcing the intent to deny an individual Stormwater Permit for the AAA State College Storage & Warehousing, LLC 146 residential unit and 73 commercial unit development in Benner Township, Centre County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2691Read more here.


    — The Department of Environmental Protection published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin announcing it is now accepting applications for Act 167 county Stormwater Management Plan preparation.  The deadline to apply is August 30.   Read more here.

    — The PA Emergency Management Agency published notice in the May 18 PA Bulletin of 2024 guidance for the Disaster Recovery Assistance Program that provides disaster relief to individuals when other Federal, State, local, nongovernmental or private aid is not available to assist victims of disasters.  Read more here.


    May 21– DCNR Snowmobile & ATV Advisory Committee meeting. Room 105 Rachel Carson Building. 10:30 a.m. Click Here for options to attend this meeting remotely.  Contact: Jake Newton at (717) 783-3349 or janewton@pa.gov.  (formal notice)

    May 22– DCNR Conservation & Natural Resources Advisory Council meeting.  Room 105 Rachel Carson Building.  10:00 a.m.  Click Here to register to join the meeting online.  Read more here on the agenda.  (formal notice)

    June 5– Rescheduled. DEP Board of Coal Mine Safety meeting.  (formal notice)

    June 6– DEP Board of Coal Mine Safety meeting.  DEP Cambria Office, 286 Industrial Park Road, Ebensburg. 10:00 a.m. Visit the Board webpage for options to join the meeting remotely.  Contact: Peggy Scheloske mscheloske@pa.gov.  (formal notice)

    PA Bulletin – May 18, 2024


    [Posted: May 17, 2024].  PA Environment Digest




  • By David E. Hess | PA Environment Digest
    May 17, 2024 | Full story

    The following DEP notices were published in the May 18 PA Bulletin related to oil and gas industry facilities.  Many of the notices offer the opportunity for public comments.


    — Repsol Oil & Gas USA, LLC: DEP received a Final Report on remediation of soil contaminated with production wastewater and diesel fuel to meet the Statewide Health Standards for a site located in McIntyre Twp., Lycoming County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2680)

    — Philadelphia Energy Solutions Refining & Marketing LLC – No.4 Separator Release: DEP received a Final Report on remediation of soil contaminated with petroleum to meet Statewide Health Standards for the site located at 3144 West Passyunk Ave. in Philadelphia. (PA Bulletin, page 2681)

    — Coterra Energy, Inc. – Aldrich Shale Gas Well Pad: DEP approved a Final Report on remediation of soil contaminated with diesel fuels at the pad located in Gibson Twp, Susquehanna County. (PA Bulletin, page 2681)

    — Philadelphia Energy Solutions Refining & Marketing, LLC – 869 Unit Cooling Townwer And Hartranft Street: DEP approved a Final report on remediation of soil contaminated with benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, cumene, 1,2,4- trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, anthracene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene, chrysene, fluorene, naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene to meet the Statewide Health Standards for the site located at 3144 Passyunk Ave. in Philadelphia.   (PA Bulletin, page 2682)


    So far in 2024, DEP received or acted on 122 Act 2 Land Recycling notices related to oil and gas facility site cleanups.


    — PennEnergy Resources, LLC – Ferree Shale Gas Well Pad Aboveground Storage Tank: DEP invites comments on a WMGR123 General Waste Permit for conventional and unconventional wastewater storage located in Middlesex Twp., Butler County. (PA Bulletin, page 2658)

    — Highland Field Services, LLC – Norris Brook Tank Farm: DEP issued a WMGR163 General Waste Permit for the storage of liquid oil and gas wastewater for the facility located in Chatham Twp., Tioga County. (PA Bulletin, page 2683)


    — Texas Eastern Transmission LP – Gas Pipeline Compressor Station: DEP invites comments on a renewal of a  State Only Air Quality Permit for a compressor station located in Bedford Twp., Bedford County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2661)

    — NFG Midstream Covington, LLC – Lawton Compressor Station: DEP issued an Air Quality Plan Approval covering multiple sources of air pollution at the facility located in Delmar Twp., Tioga County. (PA Bulletin, page 2683)

    — Mainesburg GS, LP – Wells Compressor Station: DEP issued an Air Quality Plan Approval covering multiple sources of air pollution at the facility located in Sullivan Twp., Tioga County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2683)

    — Appalachia Midstream Services, LLC – Compressor Station/Dehydration Plant:  DEP issued an Air Quality General Permit 5 for the facility located in Auburn Twp., Susquehanna County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2684)

    — Laurel Mountain Midstream Operating, LLC – Flare Replacement: DEP issued an Air Quality General Permit 5 for the facility located in South Huntingdon Twp., Westmoreland County. Susquehanna County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2684)

    — Range Resources Appalachia, LLC – Shale Gas Well Pad: DEP issued an Air Quality General Permit 5 covering multiple sources of air pollution at the facility located in Independence Twp., Beaver County.   (PA Bulletin, page 2684)

    — Calpine Mid-Merit, LLC – York Energy Center Gas-Fired Power Plant: DEP issued an Air Quality permit for the upgrade of the power plant located in Peach Bottom Twp., York County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2684)

    — Calpine Mid-Merit, LLC – York Energy Center Gas-Fired Power Plant: DEP issued an Air Quality permit with modifications for the power plant located in Peach Bottom Twp., York County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2684)

    — Energy Transfer Marketing & Terminals LP – Distribution Terminal: DEP renewed the State-Only Air Quality permit for the facility located in Allegheny Twp., Blair County.   (PA Bulletin, page 2685)


    — Williams Field Services Co., LLC: DEP issued a Chapter 102 permit for the project impacting Beebe Creek and a tributary to Each Branch Wyalusing Creek in Bridgewater Twp., Susquehanna County. (PA Bulletin, page 2088)

    — Hyperion Midstream, LLC – Leto Compressor Station: DEP issued a Chapter 102 permit for the project impacting Dawson Run located in West Deer Twp., Allegheny County.   (PA Bulletin, page 2088)

    — Range Resources Appalachia, LLC – Miller Ralph 18119 Well Site: DEP issued a Chapter 102 permit for the project impacting Raccoon Creek located in Independence Twp., Beaver County. (PA Bulletin, page 2088)

    — Range Resources Appalachia, LLC – Norris Tank Pad: DEP issued a Chapter 102 permit for the project impacting Lardintown Run in Fawn Twp., Allegheny County.  (PA Bulletin, page 2088)


    — Last Week – Permits: DEP issued 6 conventional and 2 unconventional

    — Year To Date – Permits: DEP issued 75 conventional and 170 unconventional

    — Year To Date – Wells Drilled: 52 conventional and 124 unconventional

    *Weekly Workload Report – 5.10.24

    *DEP’s Weekly Oil & Gas Program Workload Report – Most Recent


    [Posted: May 17, 2024]  PA Environment Digest




  • Map: Sarah 1H Unconventional Well Path
    Top hole is on the well pad
    Landing point is where the well lateral begins
    Bottom hole is where well lateral ends
    (Well lateral is approximately 2-miles long)



    Plat shows Equitrans LP Finleyville Storage Boundary within 2,000 feet.

    Equitrans L P 
    The Finleyville field, which contains the Fifth Sand reservoir, is found in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The Finleyville field is a Depleted Field and is Active as an underground natural gas storage facility. The base gas of the Fifth Sand reservoir is 344,000 MMcf/d. The working capacity for the reservoir is 456,000 MMcf/d. The field capacity is 800,000 MMcf/d with the maximum delivery of 38,000 MMcf/d.
    Source: ArcGIS Hub Map – Equitrans L P


    Hartson compressor station may be related to the gas storage field.



    Map: SARAH 9H Well Lateral







  • By David E. Hess | PA Environment Digest Blog
    May 15, 2024 | Full story

    On May 15, the Shapiro Administration, through an advisory board at the Department of Environmental Protection made up of environmental and community advocates, has recommended funding 21 projects to benefit the environment, heath, and quality of life of the Beaver County community to mitigate the negative impacts of the Shell Petrochemical Plant’s environmental violations.

    4K video – October 2021

    Projects include upgrades to a community park in Monaca, renovating an emergency women’s shelter to support victims of domestic violence, a solar array on the News Tribune building in Beaver Falls that will help power a local museum, and projects to protect water quality in the Beaver area. 

    The Beaver County Environmental Mitigation Community Fund was created as part of a May 2023 consent order and agreement signed between DEP and Shell Chemical Appalachia LLC that resolved air quality violations at the Shell plant from October 2022 through April 2023. Read more here.

    Under the agreement with Shell, the Shapiro Administration imposed an initial $4,935,023 penalty and Shell agreed to spend another $5 million for mitigation projects to benefit Pennsylvanians living in Beaver County.  Read more here.

    As stipulated in the May 2023 agreement, Shell paid another $2,671,004.75 in penalties for air quality violations that occurred from May 1, 2023 to the end of 2023 for a total penalty for air violations of $7,606,027.75 for the plant’s first 15 months of operations.  Read more here.


    The Environmental Mitigation Community Fund advisory board will hold a community meeting to answer questions and close out the process on Wednesday, May 29, 2024, from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. at Penn State Beaver’s Student Union Lodge at 100 University Drive, Monaca, PA 15061

    Applicants may also join virtual office hours for more private discussions on applications and additional funding opportunities in the county. Additional information and details will be posted on DEP’s community information webpage for the fund. 

    [Posted: May 15, 2024]  PA Environment Digest


    Shell’s new ethane cracker was supposed to be an economic “game changer” for Beaver County. But some of its neighbors are now fleeing its light, noise and air pollution–and the facility is facing two lawsuits.

    By Kiley Bense | Inside Climate News
    May 10, 2024 | Full story

    In 2014, when Jackie Shock-Stewart and her husband Matt Stewart first moved to Beaver County, Pennsylvania, they were only vaguely aware of plans to build a petrochemical facility in this largely suburban county on the western edge of the state.

    Pollution from the plant has been far more disruptive than most people expected. In May 2023, Shell was fined $10 million for air quality violations. Though it had only been operational for about six months, the plant had exceeded its 12-month emission limits for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and hazardous air pollutants. 

    Shock-Stewart reviewed map projections of the plant’s effects on air quality and saw that her children’s elementary school was “smack dab in the middle of an area of concern.” 

    The Shell plant was expected to emit carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, PM2.5 fine particles, sulfur dioxide, VOCs and hazardous air pollutants. Both sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide are associated with respiratory health effects like shortness of breath, asthma and wheezing, and nitrogen oxide has been shown to have a “more serious” impact on children than on adults. 

    Short-term exposure to a VOC like benzene, a known human carcinogen, can cause drowsiness, vomiting, convulsions and headaches; chronic exposure can lead to blood disorders and cancer. There are at least three elementary schools within a five-mile radius of the plant.

    As she learned more, Shock-Stewart realized that she no longer felt comfortable living so close to the plant, and the couple decided to move to Ohio in 2022.


    By Kiley Price | Inside Climate News
    May 5, 2024 | Full story

    From incessant noise to noxious odors, the Shell plastics plant has deeply impacted the residents of a western Pennsylvania county. Over the past few years, noxious chemicals, incessant noise and flashing lights in the middle of the night have plagued residents. 

    Advocacy groups and locals have filed lawsuits against Shell over these disruptions, and some decided to flee the county altogether. Researchers fear the long-term climate, health and environmental impacts of the petrochemical facility, which emits methane and millions of tons of carbon dioxide each year. 

    THE DRILLING TREADMILL
    Providing feedstock to the Shell cracker plant will require extensive drilling and fracking of unconventional gas wells (that experience rapid production declines) in the western Pennsylvania tri-state area over future decades.
    VIDEO: “Shale Promises, or Shale Spin? The Economics Behind Fracking”

    Environmental justice activists with the Houston-based Fenceline Watch told me they also struggled to get real-time information from Shell about what was happening at the site. That includes during emergencies, which is something that those monitoring the Pennsylvania plant closely are worried could happen there, too. 

    Low well bonding rates lead to future problems.

    Another thing I came across are the Google reviews of Shell Polymers Monaca, which have become a forum for residents to air their grievances about the plant. While some people offered support for the plant, most of the reviews were negative, and they echoed what I was hearing from the residents I interviewed. 





  • By David E. Hess | PA Environment Digest Blog
    May 14, 2024 | Full story

    On May 14, 2024, The Derrick reported Administrative Law Judge Mark A. Hoyer has scheduled a May 21 prehearing telephone conference as part of the Public Utility Commission investigation into the future of the Venango Water Company.

    The purpose of the prehearing is to establish a formal hearing schedule and discuss the next steps in determining whether the Commission should issue an order to have another public utility acquire the Venango Water Company.

    This action continues the PUC’s response to the problems caused by the oil well spill that contaminated the Bellows Spring water supply last July, resulting in a “do not consume” advisory in the Village of Reno that lasted six weeks.

    The PUC in August issued an emergency order to Aqua Pennsylvania to operate the Venango Water Company so clean water would continue to be provided to its customers.

    The new PUC action was prompted by the desire of Randall and Kevin Rhodes, operators of the Venango Water Company for the Rhodes Estate, to cease being certified operators for their water companies.

    The Estate also owns the Sugarcreek Water Company, West Hickory Water Company, Plumber Water Company, Fryburg Water Company, Cooperstown Water Company and the Blane E. Rhodes Sewer Company and their future may also be considered in the PUC case. 

    Images from the Titusville-Oil City Pennsylvania area

    Only official parties to the proceeding can participate in this prehearing.

    The parties include Randall Rhodes, the PUC Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement, the Office of Consumer Advocate (Attorney General), Office of Small Business Advocate, Aqua Pennsylvania (the present Venango Water Company operator) and Pennsylvania American Water (operator of water companies in the area).

    The public can listen to the prehearing call.  The conference begins at 10:00 a.m.

    Instructions for joining the call can be found in the notice of the prehearing.



    [Posted: May 14, 2024]  PA Environment Digest


  • Images: Lindell Road in front of Lawson’s home May 8
    Top center: Scranton Hollow Road May 8
    Bottom center: Logan Road May 4
    Map: Dumping area around Lawson’s home

    By David E. Hess | PA Environment Digest Blog
    May 14, 2024 | Full story

    On Mothers Day, May 12, road dumping opponent Siri Lawson in Warren County said conventional oil and gas well owners left her another “present” — they dumped their wastewater on the road in front of her home in Farmington Township for the sixth time in the last six weeks.

    Lawson testified before a Senate Committee on April 17 in opposition to the dumping of conventional wastewater on dirt and gravel roads and now it happens even on paved roads.  Read more here.

    “They brined me for the first time on the 4th of April. That made me decide I would testify, and then they brined me on the 15th,” said Lawson.  “And then two days after the hearing on the 19th, and then on the 30th, and then on the [May] 8th and then on the [May] 12th [Mothers Day].”

    Before April 4, Lawson said she did not have wastewater dumped on her road for more than six years after the Environmental Hearing Board case she brought a successful challenge to the DEP road dumping approval process in 2017-18.  Read more here.

    Lawson said the EHB hearing told the conventional industry what kind of physical reaction she has to conventional wastewater, especially when the dumping happens right in front of her house.

    My skin burns, my mouth burns, my eyes burn. 

    “These are specific reactions to oil and gas waste, and it’s painful. None of it is the usual allergy, sneezing and that stuff. This is painful,” said Lawson.

    Historically, pre-2018, the industry and the townships had a rule of thumb, do not brine dirt roads from late fall to late spring because of soft road conditions and do not brine  tar and chip ever. This targeted road dumping even violates that. 

    Lawson has been reporting all the dumping to DEP and providing photos that clearly show something was being dumped on  roads surrounding her home as well as directly in front of her house.

    Lawson said it is now obvious that conventional well owners are not just dumping on dirt and gravel roads, they have expanded to dumping on paved roads and state roads and  often just before it rains.

    “Up until the 2018 decision, they had pretty much limited themselves to dirt roads. Except they had to have a way to get rid of it,” said Lawson. “Around  2022, I started seeing brining on  paved roads.  And it was like, they can’t be. It is the dead of summer and they’re doing this.”

    “Last year, I saw more and more paved roads showing indications of well head brine spreading. And then this year, I began to frequently carry my  camera and I began to catch it in spades.”

    “I have never seen them dump on the paved roads like they’re doing now. I’ve just never seen it,” said Lawson.

    “Now, brine road dumping tends to be when rain is called for.  At first, it wasn’t. At first, it was right on dry pavement,”  said Lawson. 

    Click here for some of Siri Lawson’s photos and a map of the area




    [Posted: May 14, 2024]  PA Environment Digest


  • By Camila Domonoske | NPR
    May 10, 2024 | Full story

    With all that’s required to mine and process minerals — from giant diesel trucks to fossil-fuel-powered refineries — EV battery production has a significant carbon footprint. As a result, building an electric vehicle does more damage to the climate than building a gas car does. But the gas car starts to catch up as soon as it goes its first mile.

    If you look at the climate impact of building and using a vehicle – something called a “lifecycle analysis” – study after study has found a clear benefit to EVs. The size of the benefit varies – by vehicle, the source of the electricity it runs on, and a host of other factors – but the overall trend is obvious.

    The carbon pollution from burning gasoline and diesel in vehicles is the top contributor to climate change in the U.S. And there are other costs: Oil spills; funding for corrupt oil-rich regimes; the illnesses and preventable deaths caused by pollution from fossil fuels.

    Add it up, she says, and if you’re concerned about all the harms from mining, you’ll still want to choose an EV over a comparable gas car. And last but not least, battery minerals can be recycled.